NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1687MHz vs 1260MHz)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Mobile
8.637 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Max Q
+116%
18.71 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1215 MHz
Base Clock
585 MHz
1687 MHz
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
58
2560
Shading Units
7424
80
TMUs
232
48
ROPs
96
80
Tensor Cores
232
20
RT Cores
58
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
80.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
135.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
8.637 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
8.637 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
135.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GA103
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
22 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.8
