Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 174.3GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +77%
6.18 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
3.482 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2014
Ampere-MW
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1362 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.3GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.482 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
217.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net