Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 66% (2000MHz vs 1207MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +50%
6.18 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M
4.096 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
8
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net