NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 5300M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 168.0GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon RX 5300M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 20% (1445MHz vs 1207MHz)
Lower TDP (85W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+51%
6.18 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300M
4.069 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Nov 2019
Ampere-MW
Generation
Mobility Radeon
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1445 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
32
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.24 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
127.2 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.138 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.069 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
85W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XLM
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
