NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1207MHz vs 1200MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9260 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+187%
6.18 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM
2.15 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2016
Ampere-MW
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
14
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
