NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1260MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
+202%
18.71 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 30 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
810 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1260 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
58
2560
Shading Units
7424
80
TMUs
232
48
ROPs
96
80
Tensor Cores
232
20
RT Cores
58
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
121.0 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
292.3 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
18.71 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.71 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
292.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
GA103S
-
GPU Variant
GN20-E8-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
