Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E9174 MXM

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon E9174 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9174 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon E9174 MXM 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1219MHz vs 1207MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +395%
6.18 TFLOPS
Radeon E9174 MXM
1.248 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Oct 2017
Ampere-MW
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
E9170
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net