NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1455MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
7168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
6.18 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Max Q
+358%
28.31 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2023
Ampere-MW
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
76
2560
Shading Units
9728
80
TMUs
304
48
ROPs
112
80
Tensor Cores
304
20
RT Cores
76
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
163.0 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
442.3 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
28.31 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
28.31 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
442.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
95W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD103
-
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
4 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
