NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M5725
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 512MB VRAM FirePro M5725 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M5725 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 95W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+1330%
6.18 TFLOPS
FirePro M5725
0.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Ampere-MW
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.400 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
M96
-
GPU Variant
M96 GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
