NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Intel Arc Pro A60M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 8GB VRAM Arc Pro A60M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A60M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1300MHz vs 1207MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q
+16%
6.18 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A60M
5.325 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Jun 2023
Ampere-MW
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
80
Tensor Cores
256
20
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
166.4 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.65 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.325 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
DG2-256
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
Unknown
200 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
