NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 128MB VRAM Quadro FX Go540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1207MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 7.200GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 2021
Release Date
Aug 2004
Ampere-MW
Generation
Quadro FX Go
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
682 MHz
Base Clock
-
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
225 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
7.200GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.200 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
95W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
NV43
-
GPU Variant
QDFX-GO540-N-A4
Ampere
Architecture
Curie
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
110 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.146 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
154 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.0 (full)
2.1 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
