Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Intel Arc A350M

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q vs Intel Arc A350M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Max-Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1207MHz vs 1150MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 95W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Max Q +249%
6.18 TFLOPS
Arc A350M
1.766 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
Mar 2022
Ampere-MW
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

682 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1207 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
24
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
6
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.94 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
96.56 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
6.180 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
6.180 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
96.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

95W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
6 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net