Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1612MHz vs 1530MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
8.253 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +89%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1117 MHz
Base Clock
1312 MHz
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
320
48
ROPs
128
80
Tensor Cores
640
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Volta
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
Unknown
Transistors
21.1 billion
Unknown
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.0
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy