NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX A2000 Embedded and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1612MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (60W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 Embedded
+109%
8.253 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
3.935 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX A2000 Embedded
+437%
2001
Tesla K20Xm
372
OctaneBench
RTX A2000 Embedded
+330%
271
Tesla K20Xm
63
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1117 MHz
Base Clock
-
1612 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2688
80
TMUs
224
48
ROPs
48
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
77.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
129.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
8.253 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.253 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
129.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107S
GPU Name
GK110
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
7.08 billion
Unknown
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.5
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
