Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 108% (1627MHz vs 784MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A1000 Embedded +216%
6.664 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1192 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1627 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
1344
64
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

78.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
104.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
6.664 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.664 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
104.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.6
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy