Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA NVS 315

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2535MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
18128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +92050%
92.15 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Ada
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2175 MHz
Base Clock
-
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
48
568
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
568
Tensor Cores
-
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

486.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
1440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
92.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
92.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GF119
AD102
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
19W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy