Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada vs NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB

AI GPU We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada and a GPU: 40GB VRAM A100 SXM4 40 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 80% (2535MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 40GB)
11264 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 400W)
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1555GB/s vs 768.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 6000 Ada +372%
92.15 TFLOPS
A100 SXM4 40 GB
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2022
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Desktop
Type
AI GPU
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2175 MHz
Base Clock
1095 MHz
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

48GB
Memory Size
40GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
768.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1555GB/s

Render Config

142
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
18176
Shading Units
6912
568
TMUs
432
192
ROPs
160
568
Tensor Cores
432
142
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
96 MB
L2 Cache
40 MB

Theoretical Performance

486.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
1440 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
92.15 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
92.15 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
1440 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
GA100
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
7 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
608 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

300W
TDP
400W
700 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy