NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 48GB VRAM RTX 5880 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (2460MHz vs 2130MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
11264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 285W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
+477%
69.27 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX 5880 Ada Generation
+304%
10714
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
2649
Graphics Card
Jan 2024
Release Date
Feb 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
975 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
2460 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
864.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
110
SM Count
22
14080
Shading Units
2816
440
TMUs
88
176
ROPs
48
440
Tensor Cores
88
110
RT Cores
22
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
72 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
433.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
1082 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
69.27 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
69.27 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
1082 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
285W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
AD107
AD102
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
