NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1746MHz vs 1600MHz)
Lower TDP (300W vs 2400W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (128GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 1.02TB/s)
12544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
13.41 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+290%
52.43 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2018
Release Date
Jan 2023
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1746 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1565 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM2e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1.02TB/s
Bandwidth
3205GB/s
Render Config
60
Compute Units
-
48
SM Count
-
3840
Shading Units
16384
240
TMUs
1024
64
ROPs
0
192
Tensor Cores
1024
48
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
419.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
26.82 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
13.41 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
6.705 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS
Board Design
300W
TDP
2400W
700 W
Suggested PSU
2800 W
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Vega 20
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
Vega 20 GLXT
GPU Variant
-
GCN 5.1
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
7 nm
Process Size
10 nm
13.23 billion
Transistors
100 billion
331 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
