Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +2674%
19.17 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Ada
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

720 MHz
Base Clock
-
1560 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
280.0GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

48
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
6144
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
48
80
ROPs
32
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

124.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
299.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
19.17 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
19.17 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
299.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy