Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
7264 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Mobile Ada Generation +10200%
24.72 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1290 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

58
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
7424
Shading Units
160
232
TMUs
8
80
ROPs
4
232
Tensor Cores
-
58
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

133.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
386.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
24.72 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
24.72 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
386.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
Seymour
-
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

110W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy