NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+8864%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Feb 2010
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
12
5120
Shading Units
96
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
69W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GT215
-
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
