NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
4736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
+3000%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 635 OEM
0.743 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Oct 2013
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
384
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
8
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.736 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.94 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
742.7 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.94 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD104
GPU Name
GK208
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
1.02 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
87 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
