Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 105% (2250MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +992%
23.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
1033 MHz
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
960
160
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
24
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.96 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.84 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.108 TFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
GK106
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
8.9
CUDA
3.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net