Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2260

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2260

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
5080 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +57500%
23.04 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260
0.04 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1725 MHz
Base Clock
-
2250 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
432.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
40
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
40
160
TMUs
4
64
ROPs
4
160
Tensor Cores
-
40
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

144.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
360.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
23.04 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
23.04 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
360.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
15W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV620
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net