Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M3100

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro M3100

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 108% (1455MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +1564%
8.94 TFLOPS
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
700 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
3072
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.80 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
537.6 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars M2 LP (216-0842009)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy