Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
2752 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon E4690 MXM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +2228%
8.94 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Jun 2009
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1455 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
3072
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
96
Tensor Cores
-
24
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

69.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
139.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
8.940 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.940 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
139.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy