NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (2430MHz vs 2130MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 8800 XT
+65%
19.91 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Unknown
Quadro Ada
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1295 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
96
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
64
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
220W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Navi 48
-
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
4 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
