NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA A16 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (2130MHz vs 1695MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 231.9GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+176%
12 TFLOPS
A16 PCIe
4.339 TFLOPS
Blender
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+419%
2649
A16 PCIe
510
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Ada
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
10
2816
Shading Units
1280
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
40
22
RT Cores
10
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
5 nm
Process Size
8 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
159 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.6
