Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 605 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock 2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 14.35GB/s)
2768 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 605 OEM's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +11900%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 605 OEM
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2012
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1620MHz
Base Clock
-
2130MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000MHz
Memory Clock
897MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0 GB/s
Bandwidth
14.35 GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
48
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12MB
L2 Cache
128KB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GF119
-
GPU Variant
GF119-200-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18,900 million
Transistors
292 million
159mm²
Die Size
79mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
25W
250W
Suggested PSU
200W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy