NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 5300 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (2130MHz vs 1845MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+130%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 XT
5.196 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 2019
Quadro Ada
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
1670 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1845 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
22
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
1408
88
TMUs
88
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.04 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.4 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.39 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
324.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Navi 14
-
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
7 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
