NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+109%
12 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Apr 2017
Quadro Ada
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
36
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
2304
88
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
32
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
12 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
5 nm
Process Size
14 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
