CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 125W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+3471%
12 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
0.336 TFLOPS
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
VS
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
14
2816
Shading Units
112
88
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.60 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
336.0 GFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
125W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-270-A2
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT Mac Edition
2
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
3
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
4
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon RX 550X
5
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P102 101
6
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireGL V7700
7
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon HD 8970 OEM
8
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD Radeon R9 285
9
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
10
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs AMD FirePro RG220A
Related News
1
AMD Unveils Future Plans: Introducing Zen7 Architecture and MI500 Series
2
AMD Set to Evenly Compete with Intel in the Server CPU Market
3
AMD Launches New Instinct MI350 AI Accelerator
4
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
5
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
6
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
7
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
8
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
9
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
10
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy