Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P102 101

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA P102 101

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 28% (2130MHz vs 1670MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 10GB)
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)
NVIDIA P102 101 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +12%
12 TFLOPS
P102 101
10.69 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2018
Quadro Ada
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

1620 MHz
Base Clock
1557 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s

Render Config

22
SM Count
25
-
Compute Units
-
2816
Shading Units
3200
88
TMUs
200
48
ROPs
80
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
0 MB

Theoretical Performance

102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

AD107
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Board Design

70W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy