NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce 256 SDR
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 32MB VRAM GeForce 256 SDR to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 24 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 1.144GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Oct 1999
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 256
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
AGP 4x
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
143 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
SDR
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.144GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
480.0 MPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
480.0 MTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
NV10
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Celsius
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
220 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.017 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
139 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
7.0
4.6
OpenGL
1.2
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-
