NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs ATI FireMV 2250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 17 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 70W)
Score
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jan 2007
Quadro Ada
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
-
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
-
2816
Shading Units
-
88
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
88
Tensor Cores
-
22
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
12 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
70W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV516
-
-
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
3.0
