Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

AMD Radeon R9 Nano vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 Nano +1217%
8.192 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Pirate Islands
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1107 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
141.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
64
Compute Units
-
4096
Shading Units
240
256
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.26 GPixel/s
256.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.16 GTexel/s
8.192 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.192 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
512.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
GT200
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
GPU Variant
G200-300-A2
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Board Design

175W
TDP
236W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy