Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
7680 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3.723 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile +785%
32.98 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Crystal System
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1335 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
76
32
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
9728
128
TMUs
304
32
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
304
-
RT Cores
76
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.09 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
189.8 GPixel/s
116.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
515.3 GTexel/s
3.723 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
32.98 TFLOPS
3.723 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.98 TFLOPS
232.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
AD103
Amethyst XT
GPU Variant
GN21-X11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
4 nm
5 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
120W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy