Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 M290X 's Advantages
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition +29%
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X
2.304 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
Crystal System
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
20
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
144.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Neptune
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Neptune XT (216-0847000)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy