Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 20 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1283MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (189.4GB/s vs 174.7GB/s)
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 20 +9%
3.284 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Nov 2018
Crystal System
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
815 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1283 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
740 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
189.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
28
Compute Units
20
1792
Shading Units
1280
112
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.06 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.569 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.284 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Vega 12
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XTA
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
366 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy