Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V3800

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
3696 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 FURY X +1554%
8.602 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
Pirate Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
5
4096
Shading Units
400
256
TMUs
20
64
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

67.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
268.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
8.602 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.602 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Fiji
GPU Name
Redwood
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.9 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
596 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy