Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

AMD Radeon R9 290 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 275W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 290 +288%
4.849 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jun 2017
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
320.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
40
Compute Units
8
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

60.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
151.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
4.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
606.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Hawaii
GPU Name
Lexa
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
GCN 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.2 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
438 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

275W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy