Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

AMD Radeon R9 285X vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 285X and 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 285X 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 375W)
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 285X +20%
4.104 TFLOPS
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
264.0GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
32
Compute Units
28
2048
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

32.06 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
128.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
106.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.104 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.405 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
851.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Tahiti
Tonga XT (215-0851313)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

200W
TDP
375W
550 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy