Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 265 +1794%
1.894 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2012
Volcanic Islands
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

900 MHz
Base Clock
-
925 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
16
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
118.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GF119
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy