Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD FirePro M8900

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1350MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +746%
11.06 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2017
Release Date
Apr 2011
Radeon Pro Mac
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1250 MHz
Base Clock
-
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
-
786 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
2048bit
Memory Bus
256bit
402.4GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
64
Compute Units
12
4096
Shading Units
960
256
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
345.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
22.12 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
11.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Vega 10
GPU Name
Blackcomb
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
GCN 5.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
12.5 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
495 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy