Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1700MHz vs 1114MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 317.4GB/s)
11008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +599%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2015
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
12GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
3072
880
TMUs
192
0
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM200
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
601 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
250W
900 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy