Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
14032 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +37592%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
48
880
TMUs
24
0
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G94
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
Unknown
Die Size
240 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
65W
900 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy