Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
12544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250X +2107%
47.87 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000
2.169 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Aug 2012
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
220
Compute Units
-
14080
Shading Units
1536
880
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
1496 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
383.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
47.87 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
47.87 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK104
Aldebaran XT
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
122W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy