Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 134.8GB/s)
12544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (80W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +3538%
45.26 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Mar 2013
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
192bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
208
Compute Units
-
13312
Shading Units
768
832
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
16 MB
L2 Cache
384 KB

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GK106
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
-
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
Unknown
Die Size
221 mm²

Board Design

500W
TDP
80W
900 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy