Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA A100 PCIe vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA A100 PCIe vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

AI GPU We compared a GPU: 40GB VRAM A100 PCIe and a Professional market GPU: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA A100 PCIe 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1700MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 40GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 1555GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A100 PCIe
19.49 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +132%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Nov 2021
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Instinct
AI GPU
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

765 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

40GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2e
5120bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1555GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

108
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
208
6912
Shading Units
13312
432
TMUs
832
160
ROPs
0
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
40 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

225.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
609.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
77.97 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
19.49 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
9.746 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

250W
TDP
500W
600 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy